Facebook has reportedly settled with the FTC for a staggering $5 billion

On Friday, July 12, word spread that after over a year of investigation, Facebook agreed to settle with the Federal Trade Commission for a record-setting $5 billion. While both Facebook and the FTC declined to comment, we do know that Facebook’s data practices have been under increasing scrutiny since the Cambridge Analytica scandal following the 2016 presidential election, when a political consulting firm that worked with the Trump campaign had improperly acquired information on millions of Facebook users. This was following a 2011 consent agreement wherein Facebook agreed that it wouldn’t share data with third parties without its users’ affirmative consent.

To date, the largest penalty that the FTC has levied was against Google in 2012; that whopping $22.5 million fine now seems relatively inconsequential compared to what Facebook has reportedly agreed to.

Some critics believe a fine isn’t sufficient. Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Connecticut) and Josh Hawley (R-Missouri), for example, believe that “[p]ersonal responsibility must be recognized from the top of the corporate board down to the product development teams.” Another advocate group, Open Waters Institute, stated that "[t]he fine is a mere cost of doing business that makes breaking the law worth it for Facebook."

Unfortunately for Facebook, this settlement won’t necessarily be the end of possible regulation and legal problems. The Securities and Exchange Commission, federal prosecutors in the Eastern District of New York, and US Department of Housing and Urban Development have all taken issue with various aspects of the social media platform.

It’s unclear whether Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg will be held personally liable under the settlement, but he recently stated: “I believe Facebook has a responsibility to help address these [privacy] issues, and I’m looking forward to discussing them with lawmakers around the world… But people shouldn’t have to rely on individual companies addressing these issues by themselves. We should have a broader debate about what we want as a society and how regulation can help.”

We will continue to keep our readers posted as more news unfolds.

Advocates believe Kid Influencers Deserve Same Protections as Other Child Stars

Although there are child labor laws in California that are designed to protect child stars from exploitation (The Coogan Act), the same protections don't always apply to child YouTube and Instagram stars, or kid influencers. Kid Influencers accounts are usually run by their parents since platforms like YouTube and Instagram have age limits of 13 years old. One consequence of not owning their accounts is that all profits received go directly to the guardians and, unlike traditional child actors in California, these guardians are not required to set aside some of the profits for the children. Advocates like Paul Petersen, believe the legal protections like those in California should apply to children outside of the state. Petersen has said that because YouTube is in San Bruno, California and they are paying to broadcast children, California law must apply to those child stars. Many guardians of kid influencers feel these regulations are unnecessary and that the guardians are doi...

CARU Speaks at Community Board in Manhattan

CARU staff attorney Andra Dallas gave a presentation to Community Board 1, serving lower Manhattan on Monday, December 7 th . Andra spoke to the Board’s Youth Committee about the importance of teaching children about understanding advertising and safe online practices. District Manager Noah Pfefferblit remarked, “thank you for your informative presentation to our Youth Committee members,” and offered the Board’s assistance if they “can be helpful to the important efforts at the Children's Advertising Review Unit.” Are you interested in having a CARU staff member visit your community board? Contact adallas@caru.bbb.org.

Kids Internet Design and Safety Act Seeks to Protect Children from Harmful Online Content

United States Senators, Mr. Richard Blumenthal from Connecticut and Mr. Edward Markey from Massachusetts, introduced a new bill referred to as the Kids Internet Design and Safety Act (the “KIDS Act”). One of the Senator’s introducing the KIDS Act, Mr. Edward Markey, was the co-author of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”). The KIDS Act seeks to include noteworthy advertising rules and create new protections for children online, specifically for online users under the age of 16. The proposed advertising rules within the KIDS Act are to ban websites from: (1) exposing young online users to advertisements “with embedded interactive elements”; (2) recommending any content involving alcohol, nicotine, or tobacco to young online users; and (3) recommending content that includes influencer marketing, like unboxing videos, or host-selling to young online users. Additionally, the KIDS Act seeks to prohibit certain online features to protect children, like prohibiting...

Search This Blog