Skip to main content

Dona Fraser Interviewed on Cheddar Network About the Kid Influencer Explosion



Last week, Cheddar interviewed Dona Fraser, Director of the Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), on the rise of kid influencers, or children influencers. The discussion focused on the explosion of child content creators and the lack of guidance that technology companies and platforms face in this area. While the rules for traditional advertising to children are clear, “technology has moved far past the law. The law is trying to catch up to it. . . There are very [few] rules, [and] very little guidance,” Fraser says. Self-regulation can be effective, however, if the platforms and kid influencers contribute to the conversation for the development of guidelines.

“I think [the tech companies] can self-regulate, we just need to have all—the entire ecosystem needs to come to the table on this one. You’ve got to have the platforms, [] the companies who are creating the content, [and] the kid influencers, because I don’t think every entity understands what the touchpoints are of the other entities. So we need to get everybody in a room. CARU would love to be able to spearhead that. And, at some point have the conversation with regulators: ‘look, this is what we came up with.’ Let’s come up with some really good guidelines that work for the industry.”

To watch the full interview, click here.

Popular posts from this blog

Kids Internet Design and Safety Act Seeks to Protect Children from Harmful Online Content

United States Senators, Mr. Richard Blumenthal from Connecticut and Mr. Edward Markey from Massachusetts, introduced a new bill referred to as the Kids Internet Design and Safety Act (the “KIDS Act”). One of the Senator’s introducing the KIDS Act, Mr. Edward Markey, was the co-author of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”). The KIDS Act seeks to include noteworthy advertising rules and create new protections for children online, specifically for online users under the age of 16. The proposed advertising rules within the KIDS Act are to ban websites from: (1) exposing young online users to advertisements “with embedded interactive elements”; (2) recommending any content involving alcohol, nicotine, or tobacco to young online users; and (3) recommending content that includes influencer marketing, like unboxing videos, or host-selling to young online users. Additionally, the KIDS Act seeks to prohibit certain online features to protect children, like prohibiting...

After Review, CARU Finds Snapchat Compliant with COPPA

In a recent decision, CARU found Snap Inc.’s (Snap) Snapchat app to be compliant with both the CARU Guidelines and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).  “The company goes beyond minimal procedures to prevent under-age use” CARU stated. CARU determined that Snapchat is an app directed to a general audience, not intended for use by children. In reaching this conclusion, CARU considered that Snap’s Terms of Service clearly prohibit users under 13 years of age and makes no effort to market the app to children or provide them with an appealing user experience.  With that understanding, Snapchat is permitted under the Guidelines and Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) to age-gate and block children under 13 from using its services, which it does. CARU then examined whether Snapchat does so effectively. CARU observed that Snapchat utilizes age-gates and many safeguards to ensure that if children manage to breach the existing age-...

Advocates believe Kid Influencers Deserve Same Protections as Other Child Stars

Although there are child labor laws in California that are designed to protect child stars from exploitation (The Coogan Act), the same protections don't always apply to child YouTube and Instagram stars, or kid influencers. Kid Influencers accounts are usually run by their parents since platforms like YouTube and Instagram have age limits of 13 years old. One consequence of not owning their accounts is that all profits received go directly to the guardians and, unlike traditional child actors in California, these guardians are not required to set aside some of the profits for the children. Advocates like Paul Petersen, believe the legal protections like those in California should apply to children outside of the state. Petersen has said that because YouTube is in San Bruno, California and they are paying to broadcast children, California law must apply to those child stars. Many guardians of kid influencers feel these regulations are unnecessary and that the guardians are doi...