Skip to main content

CARU's Director Interviewed About Child Influencers for ABC's Radio Show in Australia


This week, Dona Fraser, Director of the Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), was interviewed on Australian Broadcasting Corporation's radio show, Sunday Extra, to discuss the relationship between paid advertising and child influencers. Fraser discussed how the lack of guidelines on the Internet is allowing companies to take advantage of the vulnerability of children through these child influencers. Many of these influencers, who broadcast to younger audiences, are given products to use in their videos and “it’s very difficult, even for adults, to discern what is an advertisement versus what is actually programming. When you have a child that’s simply sitting in front of a camera unboxing a game or a toy, it’s difficult for a child... to understand that maybe this child [influencer] was given the product by a company and is being ask to do this spot,” Fraser says.

Fraser spoke about how CARU is asking for some sort of disclosure to let viewers know that what they are watching is not entertainment, it is an advertisement. Part of the problem is that these influencers, who are teens and tweens, have much younger followers because “kids always want to age up” and “probably do not understand that an [influencer’s video content] may be perceived as an advertisement.” Although these brands are trying to find relatable influencers to sell product, it needs to be made apparent to younger viewers that what they are watching an advertisement.

To learn more, listen to the full interview about child influencers and self-regulation.


Popular posts from this blog

Kids Internet Design and Safety Act Seeks to Protect Children from Harmful Online Content

United States Senators, Mr. Richard Blumenthal from Connecticut and Mr. Edward Markey from Massachusetts, introduced a new bill referred to as the Kids Internet Design and Safety Act (the “KIDS Act”). One of the Senator’s introducing the KIDS Act, Mr. Edward Markey, was the co-author of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”). The KIDS Act seeks to include noteworthy advertising rules and create new protections for children online, specifically for online users under the age of 16. The proposed advertising rules within the KIDS Act are to ban websites from: (1) exposing young online users to advertisements “with embedded interactive elements”; (2) recommending any content involving alcohol, nicotine, or tobacco to young online users; and (3) recommending content that includes influencer marketing, like unboxing videos, or host-selling to young online users. Additionally, the KIDS Act seeks to prohibit certain online features to protect children, like prohibiting...

After Review, CARU Finds Snapchat Compliant with COPPA

In a recent decision, CARU found Snap Inc.’s (Snap) Snapchat app to be compliant with both the CARU Guidelines and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).  “The company goes beyond minimal procedures to prevent under-age use” CARU stated. CARU determined that Snapchat is an app directed to a general audience, not intended for use by children. In reaching this conclusion, CARU considered that Snap’s Terms of Service clearly prohibit users under 13 years of age and makes no effort to market the app to children or provide them with an appealing user experience.  With that understanding, Snapchat is permitted under the Guidelines and Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) to age-gate and block children under 13 from using its services, which it does. CARU then examined whether Snapchat does so effectively. CARU observed that Snapchat utilizes age-gates and many safeguards to ensure that if children manage to breach the existing age-...

Advocates believe Kid Influencers Deserve Same Protections as Other Child Stars

Although there are child labor laws in California that are designed to protect child stars from exploitation (The Coogan Act), the same protections don't always apply to child YouTube and Instagram stars, or kid influencers. Kid Influencers accounts are usually run by their parents since platforms like YouTube and Instagram have age limits of 13 years old. One consequence of not owning their accounts is that all profits received go directly to the guardians and, unlike traditional child actors in California, these guardians are not required to set aside some of the profits for the children. Advocates like Paul Petersen, believe the legal protections like those in California should apply to children outside of the state. Petersen has said that because YouTube is in San Bruno, California and they are paying to broadcast children, California law must apply to those child stars. Many guardians of kid influencers feel these regulations are unnecessary and that the guardians are doi...