Skip to main content

Unsealed Internal Facebook Documents Reveal Deceptive Practices Against Children, Leading to FTC Complaint



On February 21, 2019, more than a dozen child advocacy groups sent a complaint to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) calling for an investigation as to whether Facebook has engaged in unfair or deceptive practices in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). Advocates filed the complaint in response to unsealed documents from a 2012 class action lawsuit against Facebook, in which the technology giant was accused of targeting children to expand revenue for online games. Though the class action settled in 2016, advocates believe more needs to be done, especially to ensure that Facebook doesn’t take advantage of children and their parents in the future. 

Internal Facebook memos, secret strategies, and employee emails were among the 135 pages of documents unsealed from the 2012 lawsuit.  They allegedly revealed that the company knowingly deceived children into making in-game purchases and crafted an endless maze for seeking refunds, making it nearly impossible to get money back from such purchases.

According to the complaint, the internal documents show that Facebook admitted engaging in “friendly fraud” by encouraging game developers to allow children to make purchases without their parents’ permission.  The company also allegedly called children “whales” for spending exorbitant sums of money on games—even though most of the children did not know that their parents’ credit cards were connected to the accounts or that they were spending “real money” in the games.

Popular posts from this blog

Advocates believe Kid Influencers Deserve Same Protections as Other Child Stars

Although there are child labor laws in California that are designed to protect child stars from exploitation (The Coogan Act), the same protections don't always apply to child YouTube and Instagram stars, or kid influencers. Kid Influencers accounts are usually run by their parents since platforms like YouTube and Instagram have age limits of 13 years old. One consequence of not owning their accounts is that all profits received go directly to the guardians and, unlike traditional child actors in California, these guardians are not required to set aside some of the profits for the children. Advocates like Paul Petersen, believe the legal protections like those in California should apply to children outside of the state. Petersen has said that because YouTube is in San Bruno, California and they are paying to broadcast children, California law must apply to those child stars. Many guardians of kid influencers feel these regulations are unnecessary and that the guardians are doi...

CARU Speaks at Community Board in Manhattan

CARU staff attorney Andra Dallas gave a presentation to Community Board 1, serving lower Manhattan on Monday, December 7 th .  Andra spoke to the Board’s Youth Committee about the importance of teaching children about understanding advertising and safe online practices.  District Manager Noah Pfefferblit remarked, “thank you for your informative presentation to our Youth Committee members,” and offered the Board’s assistance if they “can be helpful to the important efforts at the Children's Advertising Review Unit.” Are you interested in having a CARU staff member visit your community board? Contact adallas@caru.bbb.org.

Kids Internet Design and Safety Act Seeks to Protect Children from Harmful Online Content

United States Senators, Mr. Richard Blumenthal from Connecticut and Mr. Edward Markey from Massachusetts, introduced a new bill referred to as the Kids Internet Design and Safety Act (the “KIDS Act”). One of the Senator’s introducing the KIDS Act, Mr. Edward Markey, was the co-author of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”). The KIDS Act seeks to include noteworthy advertising rules and create new protections for children online, specifically for online users under the age of 16. The proposed advertising rules within the KIDS Act are to ban websites from: (1) exposing young online users to advertisements “with embedded interactive elements”; (2) recommending any content involving alcohol, nicotine, or tobacco to young online users; and (3) recommending content that includes influencer marketing, like unboxing videos, or host-selling to young online users. Additionally, the KIDS Act seeks to prohibit certain online features to protect children, like prohibiting...