Musical.ly (Now TikTok) Agrees to Largest-Ever COPPA Settlement in Record FTC Proceeding

Today, February 27, 2019, the FTC issued the largest civil penalty ever obtained on a children’s privacy case. Musical.ly (now called TikTok) has agreed to pay $5.7 million to settle the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC’s) complaint that the company illegally collected personal information from children. Musical.ly also agreed to comply with Children Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) going forward and to take down all videos made by children under the age of 13.

Musical.ly’s platform allowed users to create and post short videos lip-syncing to music, as well as communicate with other users in the social network. All users were required to provide a first and last name, email address, phone number, profile picture, and biography to register for the app. The company had knowledge that a significant portion of its users were under 13 years old.

The FTC learned of the issues when CARU referred the matter to the FTC last spring. In its complaint, the FTC claimed that the company was aware of the fact that many children used its app, but failed to follow COPPA in notifying parents about the app’s collection and use of children’s personal information, obtaining parental consent for such collection, and deleting personal information at the request of parents. The settlement is a big win for child advocacy groups, and addresses the growing concern of children’s privacy protection in the age of Big Tech.

In a joint statement, FTC Commissioner Rohit Chopra and Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter note that the case was a major milestone for the COPPA enforcement program. The Commissioners noted the company's willingness to pursue growth at the expense of children and the belief that company executives should be held accountable for the disregard of the law.

For more information about the Musical.ly decision, read the FTC's Press Release or the Commissioners joint statement.

Read CARU's Press Release about its referral of the Musical.ly case to the FTC.

See a quote from CARU's director, Dona Fraser in this Wired article.

Kids Internet Design and Safety Act Seeks to Protect Children from Harmful Online Content

United States Senators, Mr. Richard Blumenthal from Connecticut and Mr. Edward Markey from Massachusetts, introduced a new bill referred to as the Kids Internet Design and Safety Act (the “KIDS Act”). One of the Senator’s introducing the KIDS Act, Mr. Edward Markey, was the co-author of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”). The KIDS Act seeks to include noteworthy advertising rules and create new protections for children online, specifically for online users under the age of 16. The proposed advertising rules within the KIDS Act are to ban websites from: (1) exposing young online users to advertisements “with embedded interactive elements”; (2) recommending any content involving alcohol, nicotine, or tobacco to young online users; and (3) recommending content that includes influencer marketing, like unboxing videos, or host-selling to young online users. Additionally, the KIDS Act seeks to prohibit certain online features to protect children, like prohibiting...

Advocates believe Kid Influencers Deserve Same Protections as Other Child Stars

Although there are child labor laws in California that are designed to protect child stars from exploitation (The Coogan Act), the same protections don't always apply to child YouTube and Instagram stars, or kid influencers. Kid Influencers accounts are usually run by their parents since platforms like YouTube and Instagram have age limits of 13 years old. One consequence of not owning their accounts is that all profits received go directly to the guardians and, unlike traditional child actors in California, these guardians are not required to set aside some of the profits for the children. Advocates like Paul Petersen, believe the legal protections like those in California should apply to children outside of the state. Petersen has said that because YouTube is in San Bruno, California and they are paying to broadcast children, California law must apply to those child stars. Many guardians of kid influencers feel these regulations are unnecessary and that the guardians are doi...

After Review, CARU Finds Snapchat Compliant with COPPA

In a recent decision, CARU found Snap Inc.’s (Snap) Snapchat app to be compliant with both the CARU Guidelines and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). “The company goes beyond minimal procedures to prevent under-age use” CARU stated. CARU determined that Snapchat is an app directed to a general audience, not intended for use by children. In reaching this conclusion, CARU considered that Snap’s Terms of Service clearly prohibit users under 13 years of age and makes no effort to market the app to children or provide them with an appealing user experience. With that understanding, Snapchat is permitted under the Guidelines and Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) to age-gate and block children under 13 from using its services, which it does. CARU then examined whether Snapchat does so effectively. CARU observed that Snapchat utilizes age-gates and many safeguards to ensure that if children manage to breach the existing age-...

Search This Blog