Skip to main content

Is E-cigarette Marketing Déjà Vu for the Advertising Industry?

By, Angela Tiffin, Senior Attorney, Children's Advertising Review Unit

We all agree, and CARU’s guidelines provide, that products that may pose a safety risk to children should not be marketed directly to them.  When advertising includes product packaging and campaigns not aimed directly to children, the waters can get pretty muddy.

This month the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a joint press release regarding 13 warning letters issued to manufacturers, distributors, and retailers for selling e-liquids used in e-cigarettes with labeling and/or advertising that resembled kid-friendly food products.[1]

The “Joe Camel” marketing campaign by tobacco company R.J. Reynolds may seem like ancient history but it was only in 1998 that 46 states reached a settlement prohibiting direct and indirect marketing to youth and the use of cartoons in cigarette advertising.[2]

Despite this, as recent as 2004, R.J. Reynolds was at it again, this time aggressively marketing flavored cigarette products with appealing names like Warm Winter Toffee, Twista Lime and Winter Mocha Mint in media with a large youth audience.[3]

It has only been since 2009, when President Barack Obama signed The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act,[4] that the FDA could ban candy and fruit-flavored cigarettes.  Obama at the time acknowledged that he started smoking as a teenager.

The press release noted examples of products with names such as “One Mad Hit Juice Box,” which resembled a children’s juice box.  Other flavors, such as “Vape Heads Sour Smurf Sauce,” resembled War Heads candy, an Impact Confectioner’s brand.

CARU has also observed other e-cigarette retailers selling products containing nicotine that sound suspiciously like popular trademarked brands that are regularly marketed to children.  Confectioners and cereal brands can’t be happy with these comparisonseven if these products are not advertised in children’s media.

For instance, VapeWild.com has a product called Fruit Hoops shown with a bowl of colorful cereal behind it that looks like a branded cereal.  Vaporfi sells a vape juice & e-liquid product described as “strawberrylicious + Lemon Zest + Fruity Cereal” called “Saturday Morning Cereal Vape Juice,” a name that invokes memories of watching Saturday morning cartoons with a favorite bowl of cereal.  The accompanying image is a bowl of colorful cereal with fruit all around. 

The FTC and FDA noted that the rise in popularity of electronic nicotine devices (ENDS) has led to an increase in reports to poison control centers and visits to emergency rooms of children under six who’ve had exposure to or ingestion of e-cigarettes and liquid nicotine.  In these cases, were children attracted to product packaging with colorful images of candy, fruits and other child-friendly snacks? 

A recent report by The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine entitled Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes[5] found that although e-cigarettes appear to pose less risk than regular combustible tobacco cigarettes, for youth and young adults, there is substantial evidence that e-cigarette use increases the risk of using regular cigarettes in the future.  It also noted that the use of e-cigarettes results in dependence on the devices, which could be problematic because the implications of long-term effects on morbidity are not yet clear.[6]

The basis for the warning letters focus on the misbranding of the e-cigarette products in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act because the labeling and/or advertising that imitates kid-friendly foods is false and misleading.

CARU, as always, will be monitoring children’s media and the Internet to make sure these products are not being marketed directly to children.                                                                                                       


[2] See also, Camel Cigarettes: A Long History of Targeting Kids at: https://www.tobaccofreekids.org/microsites/camel/Camel_History.pdf
[3] Id. at 2.
[4] See, The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, 21 U.S.C § 301 (2009).
[5] See report, Public Consequences of E-Cigarettes, Consensus Study Report by The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine January 2018 at: http://nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2018/public-health-consequences-of-e-cigarettes.aspx
[6] The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, supra.

Popular posts from this blog

20 Years Young: The History and Maturing of COPPA in a Privacy-Conscious Age

1998: A Concern for Children’s Privacy Was Born From the moment home computers had the capacity to connect to the Internet, children had the ability to use these technologies to access online websites and services. In the 1990s, concerns about children’s privacy and safety online arose amid fears of marketing practices around selling children’s personal information and exposing children’s information to predators. The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), founded in 1974, has always been on the forefront of safeguarding children’s privacy. CARU is the self-regulatory arm of the children’s advertising industry, tasked with promoting truth in children’s advertising by reviewing and evaluating child-directed ads in all media to ensure they are truthful, accurate and appropriate. CARU also monitors online privacy practices as they affect children. Before there was any legislation on the matter, CARU monitored a burgeoning Internet and observed how children’s privacy and sa...

After Review, CARU Finds Snapchat Compliant with COPPA

In a recent decision, CARU found Snap Inc.’s (Snap) Snapchat app to be compliant with both the CARU Guidelines and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).  “The company goes beyond minimal procedures to prevent under-age use” CARU stated. CARU determined that Snapchat is an app directed to a general audience, not intended for use by children. In reaching this conclusion, CARU considered that Snap’s Terms of Service clearly prohibit users under 13 years of age and makes no effort to market the app to children or provide them with an appealing user experience.  With that understanding, Snapchat is permitted under the Guidelines and Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) to age-gate and block children under 13 from using its services, which it does. CARU then examined whether Snapchat does so effectively. CARU observed that Snapchat utilizes age-gates and many safeguards to ensure that if children manage to breach the existing age-...

Kids Internet Design and Safety Act Seeks to Protect Children from Harmful Online Content

United States Senators, Mr. Richard Blumenthal from Connecticut and Mr. Edward Markey from Massachusetts, introduced a new bill referred to as the Kids Internet Design and Safety Act (the “KIDS Act”). One of the Senator’s introducing the KIDS Act, Mr. Edward Markey, was the co-author of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”). The KIDS Act seeks to include noteworthy advertising rules and create new protections for children online, specifically for online users under the age of 16. The proposed advertising rules within the KIDS Act are to ban websites from: (1) exposing young online users to advertisements “with embedded interactive elements”; (2) recommending any content involving alcohol, nicotine, or tobacco to young online users; and (3) recommending content that includes influencer marketing, like unboxing videos, or host-selling to young online users. Additionally, the KIDS Act seeks to prohibit certain online features to protect children, like prohibiting...