Skip to main content

CARU Invited to Twitter Chat by Federal Trade Commission to Celebrate Law's 20th Anniversary


The Federal Trade Commission took to Twitter and hosted a chat this past Tuesday, March 6, 2018 to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). CARU was honored to be the only organization asked to join in the commemorative event. As the first FTC-approved Safe Harbor, CARU has a deep understanding of the ins and outs of the law and has worked hard to ensure compliance. CARU's Director, Dona Fraser and the FTC's Acting Chairman, Maureen K. Ohlhausen discussed their work to enforce COPPA and how the law has evolved to keep up with changing technologies. Both answered questions to an audience eager to learn more about nuances of this complex law. Senator Ed Markey from Massachusetts who helped author COPPA even stopped by to applaud the FTC's work to continue to ensure kids online safety.

For those less familiar with COPPA, the law imposes certain requirements on operators of websites and online services directed to children under 13 years of age, and on operators that have actual knowledge that they are collecting personal information online from a child under 13 years of age. Those held accountable under the law must obtain verifiable parental consent before collecting personal information from children as well. COPPA also prohibits conditioning a child's participation on the collection of their personal information and requires security of that collection and imposes certain data retention/deletion requirements.

To review the chat, check #COPPAChat on Twitter. And don't forget to follow @CARUAdReview for more updates on what The Children's Advertising Review Unit is up to.

Popular posts from this blog

Kids Internet Design and Safety Act Seeks to Protect Children from Harmful Online Content

United States Senators, Mr. Richard Blumenthal from Connecticut and Mr. Edward Markey from Massachusetts, introduced a new bill referred to as the Kids Internet Design and Safety Act (the “KIDS Act”). One of the Senator’s introducing the KIDS Act, Mr. Edward Markey, was the co-author of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”). The KIDS Act seeks to include noteworthy advertising rules and create new protections for children online, specifically for online users under the age of 16. The proposed advertising rules within the KIDS Act are to ban websites from: (1) exposing young online users to advertisements “with embedded interactive elements”; (2) recommending any content involving alcohol, nicotine, or tobacco to young online users; and (3) recommending content that includes influencer marketing, like unboxing videos, or host-selling to young online users. Additionally, the KIDS Act seeks to prohibit certain online features to protect children, like prohibiting...

After Review, CARU Finds Snapchat Compliant with COPPA

In a recent decision, CARU found Snap Inc.’s (Snap) Snapchat app to be compliant with both the CARU Guidelines and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).  “The company goes beyond minimal procedures to prevent under-age use” CARU stated. CARU determined that Snapchat is an app directed to a general audience, not intended for use by children. In reaching this conclusion, CARU considered that Snap’s Terms of Service clearly prohibit users under 13 years of age and makes no effort to market the app to children or provide them with an appealing user experience.  With that understanding, Snapchat is permitted under the Guidelines and Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) to age-gate and block children under 13 from using its services, which it does. CARU then examined whether Snapchat does so effectively. CARU observed that Snapchat utilizes age-gates and many safeguards to ensure that if children manage to breach the existing age-...

Advocates believe Kid Influencers Deserve Same Protections as Other Child Stars

Although there are child labor laws in California that are designed to protect child stars from exploitation (The Coogan Act), the same protections don't always apply to child YouTube and Instagram stars, or kid influencers. Kid Influencers accounts are usually run by their parents since platforms like YouTube and Instagram have age limits of 13 years old. One consequence of not owning their accounts is that all profits received go directly to the guardians and, unlike traditional child actors in California, these guardians are not required to set aside some of the profits for the children. Advocates like Paul Petersen, believe the legal protections like those in California should apply to children outside of the state. Petersen has said that because YouTube is in San Bruno, California and they are paying to broadcast children, California law must apply to those child stars. Many guardians of kid influencers feel these regulations are unnecessary and that the guardians are doi...