Skip to main content

Common Sense Media Releases New Report on Teen and Tween Media Consumption

Common Sense Media released The Common Sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and Teens, which examines how U.S. Teens and Tweens consume media in 2015. 

On November 4, 2015 Angela Tiffin, on behalf of CARU, attended the rollout of the new report in Washington D.C. at the Henry G. Kaiser Family Foundation Barbara Jordan Conference Center.  The event included a panel discussion with the report's lead author, Vicky Rideout, FCC commissioner, Mignon L. Clyburn and Dr. Ellen Wartella, Professor of Communications and Director of the Center on Media and Human Development at North Western University and long time academic advisor at CARU.  


Ellen Wartella and Angela Tiffin


The report confirmed that tweens and teens use digital media for several hours a day but varied in their preferences and patterns of use depending on age and other factors like socio-economic background.  The report showed that the more things change the more they stay the same; listening to music and watching TV is still at the top of a teen and tween's favorite thing to do --even if the way they consume their media is completely different than their parents at the same age.


Common Sense Media CEO, James Steyer

Tina Poturica attended the event in New York City, which was moderated by Kelly Wallace
CNN Digital Correspondent & Editor-at-Large at Gotham Hall. Kelly kept the conversation going with leading experts in child development, media, and policy to learn about the evolving relationships between families and technology. 

Popular posts from this blog

Kids Internet Design and Safety Act Seeks to Protect Children from Harmful Online Content

United States Senators, Mr. Richard Blumenthal from Connecticut and Mr. Edward Markey from Massachusetts, introduced a new bill referred to as the Kids Internet Design and Safety Act (the “KIDS Act”). One of the Senator’s introducing the KIDS Act, Mr. Edward Markey, was the co-author of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”). The KIDS Act seeks to include noteworthy advertising rules and create new protections for children online, specifically for online users under the age of 16. The proposed advertising rules within the KIDS Act are to ban websites from: (1) exposing young online users to advertisements “with embedded interactive elements”; (2) recommending any content involving alcohol, nicotine, or tobacco to young online users; and (3) recommending content that includes influencer marketing, like unboxing videos, or host-selling to young online users. Additionally, the KIDS Act seeks to prohibit certain online features to protect children, like prohibiting...

After Review, CARU Finds Snapchat Compliant with COPPA

In a recent decision, CARU found Snap Inc.’s (Snap) Snapchat app to be compliant with both the CARU Guidelines and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).  “The company goes beyond minimal procedures to prevent under-age use” CARU stated. CARU determined that Snapchat is an app directed to a general audience, not intended for use by children. In reaching this conclusion, CARU considered that Snap’s Terms of Service clearly prohibit users under 13 years of age and makes no effort to market the app to children or provide them with an appealing user experience.  With that understanding, Snapchat is permitted under the Guidelines and Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) to age-gate and block children under 13 from using its services, which it does. CARU then examined whether Snapchat does so effectively. CARU observed that Snapchat utilizes age-gates and many safeguards to ensure that if children manage to breach the existing age-...

Advocates believe Kid Influencers Deserve Same Protections as Other Child Stars

Although there are child labor laws in California that are designed to protect child stars from exploitation (The Coogan Act), the same protections don't always apply to child YouTube and Instagram stars, or kid influencers. Kid Influencers accounts are usually run by their parents since platforms like YouTube and Instagram have age limits of 13 years old. One consequence of not owning their accounts is that all profits received go directly to the guardians and, unlike traditional child actors in California, these guardians are not required to set aside some of the profits for the children. Advocates like Paul Petersen, believe the legal protections like those in California should apply to children outside of the state. Petersen has said that because YouTube is in San Bruno, California and they are paying to broadcast children, California law must apply to those child stars. Many guardians of kid influencers feel these regulations are unnecessary and that the guardians are doi...