Skip to main content

Experts Recommends Children 14 and Under be Protected by Food Marketing Policies


A panel of experts convened recently. They were brought together by the Healthy Eating Research, a program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Panelists include Margo Wootan Director of Nutrition for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, David Britt former CEO of Sesame Workshop, Dale Kunkel of University of Arizona, William Deitz of George Washington University and members of the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Heart Association and the American Cancer Society. The group had several recommendations for policies on food marketing aimed at kids. 

First, the panel recommended that the who is considered to be the audience of children should be expanded. The group believes that not only kids 11 and younger should be covered. Instead, the experts recommend that audiences of children ages 14 and younger should be included. Second, the group said that media/programs should be considered child-directed if children make up 25 percent or more of the audience, as opposed to what most companies use now, which is 35 percent.

The experts also believe that sometimes advertising that doesn't appear in specifically kid-targeted programs/websites, should still be able to be considered kids marketing in certain situations. That means that food packaging, toy premiums and even things like in-store displays would be covered under the proposed approach.

Elaine Kolish of the The Children's Food and Beverage Advertising Initiative issued a statement about the Healthy Eating Research Recommendations. 


CFBAI CARU and HER share the goal of wanting our nation’s children to grow up healthy. Childhood obesity is multi-faceted problem that requires all segments of our society to solve. Through our programs, major food and beverage advertisers are part of the solution. CFBAI and CARU administer robust, highly-regarded advertising self-regulation programs that have significantly improved the children’s food marketing landscape.


To read Elaine Kolish's full statement, please visit the Better Business Bureau's Website

Popular posts from this blog

Kids Internet Design and Safety Act Seeks to Protect Children from Harmful Online Content

United States Senators, Mr. Richard Blumenthal from Connecticut and Mr. Edward Markey from Massachusetts, introduced a new bill referred to as the Kids Internet Design and Safety Act (the “KIDS Act”). One of the Senator’s introducing the KIDS Act, Mr. Edward Markey, was the co-author of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”). The KIDS Act seeks to include noteworthy advertising rules and create new protections for children online, specifically for online users under the age of 16. The proposed advertising rules within the KIDS Act are to ban websites from: (1) exposing young online users to advertisements “with embedded interactive elements”; (2) recommending any content involving alcohol, nicotine, or tobacco to young online users; and (3) recommending content that includes influencer marketing, like unboxing videos, or host-selling to young online users. Additionally, the KIDS Act seeks to prohibit certain online features to protect children, like prohibiting...

After Review, CARU Finds Snapchat Compliant with COPPA

In a recent decision, CARU found Snap Inc.’s (Snap) Snapchat app to be compliant with both the CARU Guidelines and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).  “The company goes beyond minimal procedures to prevent under-age use” CARU stated. CARU determined that Snapchat is an app directed to a general audience, not intended for use by children. In reaching this conclusion, CARU considered that Snap’s Terms of Service clearly prohibit users under 13 years of age and makes no effort to market the app to children or provide them with an appealing user experience.  With that understanding, Snapchat is permitted under the Guidelines and Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) to age-gate and block children under 13 from using its services, which it does. CARU then examined whether Snapchat does so effectively. CARU observed that Snapchat utilizes age-gates and many safeguards to ensure that if children manage to breach the existing age-...

Advocates believe Kid Influencers Deserve Same Protections as Other Child Stars

Although there are child labor laws in California that are designed to protect child stars from exploitation (The Coogan Act), the same protections don't always apply to child YouTube and Instagram stars, or kid influencers. Kid Influencers accounts are usually run by their parents since platforms like YouTube and Instagram have age limits of 13 years old. One consequence of not owning their accounts is that all profits received go directly to the guardians and, unlike traditional child actors in California, these guardians are not required to set aside some of the profits for the children. Advocates like Paul Petersen, believe the legal protections like those in California should apply to children outside of the state. Petersen has said that because YouTube is in San Bruno, California and they are paying to broadcast children, California law must apply to those child stars. Many guardians of kid influencers feel these regulations are unnecessary and that the guardians are doi...