CARU was pleased to hold its first conference in Los Angeles, California this past month. CARU's director, Wayne Keeley, Associate Director, Phyllis Spaeth, and Staff Attorney Andra Dallas ventured out to the West coast. The half-day event was free and covered potential changes to the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act. CARU explored issues raised by the Rule review at the FTC's COPPA roudtable in D.C., including possible changes to the definition of Personally Identifiable Information as well as the application of the terms internet and website to new devices and technologies. CARU also provided an overview of what we do and our Guidelines for those who were unfamiliar with CARU.
Although there are child labor laws in California that are designed to protect child stars from exploitation (The Coogan Act), the same protections don't always apply to child YouTube and Instagram stars, or kid influencers. Kid Influencers accounts are usually run by their parents since platforms like YouTube and Instagram have age limits of 13 years old. One consequence of not owning their accounts is that all profits received go directly to the guardians and, unlike traditional child actors in California, these guardians are not required to set aside some of the profits for the children. Advocates like Paul Petersen, believe the legal protections like those in California should apply to children outside of the state. Petersen has said that because YouTube is in San Bruno, California and they are paying to broadcast children, California law must apply to those child stars. Many guardians of kid influencers feel these regulations are unnecessary and that the guardians are doi...