Skip to main content

Apple Will Refund at Least $32.5 Million in FTC Settlement




Apple has agreed to pay at least $32.5 million to settle a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) complaint that it charged consumers for in-app purchases incurred by children on kids’ mobile apps without verifiable parental consent.  Apple has also agreed to change its billing practices by March 31, 2014 to ensure that it receives “informed” verifiable parental consent before charging for in-app purchases made on mobile apps directed to children. Apple also agreed that if it gets consumers’ consent for future charges, consumers must have the option to withdraw their consent at any time.

Under the current system on iTunes, parents were required to enter a password to process in-app purchases, however, according to the FTC, Apple failed to notify parents that by doing so, in addition to approving a single in-app purchase that they were also consenting to 15 minutes of additional unlimited purchases their children could make without further action from the parent.

In its press release, the FTC noted that Apple has received thousands of complaints about unauthorized purchases. FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez said in a statement, “This settlement is a victory for consumers harmed by Apple’s unfair billing, and a signal to the business community: whether you’re doing business in the mobile arena or the mall down the street, fundamental consumer protections apply, you cannot charge consumers for purchases they did not authorize.” 

Under the settlement, Apple must pay at least $32.5 Million to consumers billed for in-app purchases incurred by children that were accidental or unauthorized. Should Apple be required to issue less than the full $32.5 million, it must forfeit the balance to the FTC.

For more information visit the FTC's Press Release.

Popular posts from this blog

20 Years Young: The History and Maturing of COPPA in a Privacy-Conscious Age

1998: A Concern for Children’s Privacy Was Born From the moment home computers had the capacity to connect to the Internet, children had the ability to use these technologies to access online websites and services. In the 1990s, concerns about children’s privacy and safety online arose amid fears of marketing practices around selling children’s personal information and exposing children’s information to predators. The Children’s Advertising Review Unit (CARU), founded in 1974, has always been on the forefront of safeguarding children’s privacy. CARU is the self-regulatory arm of the children’s advertising industry, tasked with promoting truth in children’s advertising by reviewing and evaluating child-directed ads in all media to ensure they are truthful, accurate and appropriate. CARU also monitors online privacy practices as they affect children. Before there was any legislation on the matter, CARU monitored a burgeoning Internet and observed how children’s privacy and sa...

Kids Internet Design and Safety Act Seeks to Protect Children from Harmful Online Content

United States Senators, Mr. Richard Blumenthal from Connecticut and Mr. Edward Markey from Massachusetts, introduced a new bill referred to as the Kids Internet Design and Safety Act (the “KIDS Act”). One of the Senator’s introducing the KIDS Act, Mr. Edward Markey, was the co-author of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”). The KIDS Act seeks to include noteworthy advertising rules and create new protections for children online, specifically for online users under the age of 16. The proposed advertising rules within the KIDS Act are to ban websites from: (1) exposing young online users to advertisements “with embedded interactive elements”; (2) recommending any content involving alcohol, nicotine, or tobacco to young online users; and (3) recommending content that includes influencer marketing, like unboxing videos, or host-selling to young online users. Additionally, the KIDS Act seeks to prohibit certain online features to protect children, like prohibiting...

After Review, CARU Finds Snapchat Compliant with COPPA

In a recent decision, CARU found Snap Inc.’s (Snap) Snapchat app to be compliant with both the CARU Guidelines and the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).  “The company goes beyond minimal procedures to prevent under-age use” CARU stated. CARU determined that Snapchat is an app directed to a general audience, not intended for use by children. In reaching this conclusion, CARU considered that Snap’s Terms of Service clearly prohibit users under 13 years of age and makes no effort to market the app to children or provide them with an appealing user experience.  With that understanding, Snapchat is permitted under the Guidelines and Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”) to age-gate and block children under 13 from using its services, which it does. CARU then examined whether Snapchat does so effectively. CARU observed that Snapchat utilizes age-gates and many safeguards to ensure that if children manage to breach the existing age-...